TheMac shows that, if they really wanted, they could do it. Having released its excellent Color-Mechanic plug-in for I think that refusing to consider the Mac and Linux platforms is another great mistakeįrom the PW producer. One of the best programmers around that understands photography, but when itĬomes to put together a time-efficient work-flow, PW is a toy and PS really shines. The moreI study PS, the more I realize that PW is an extroardinay toolbox, crafted by Unworkable in these times of 5400 dpi film scanners giving you 200MB files! Newimage after every change very primitive and a huge memory hog. Having now discovered the layers in PS, I find the PW system of generating a Than a few pictures is very frustrating and error-prone. Problem for me is having the different dialog boxes automatically returning to theirĭefault values every time you use them! Going through a typical worflow for more Some things had really started to annoy me with PW, its biggest drawback being theĬomplete disdain of its author for productivity-oriented features. All in all, I consider PhotoShop to be the better of the two, and by a I very reluctantly gave a try to PhotoShop and I have to admit it really has its own The biggest reason has of course been my own transition from Windows to Mac OS X. Ought to be in every photo editing software. Its unique features like generalized 16bits support and filters bank I have been a long time fan of Picture Window.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
December 2022
Categories |